2nd Circuit: Art theft does not violate the law of nations

Yesterday, the 2nd Circuit affirmed the F.R.C.P Rule 12(b)(1) dismissal of Orkin v. Swiss Confederation.

The quick and dirty: Plaintiff brought a FSIA and ATS claim against the Swiss Government for the 1933 sale of a Vincent Van Gogh by his Jewish great grandmother to a Swiss art collector.  Plaintiff claims the sale was conducted under duress.  With regard to the ATS claim, the court stated that the sale did not rise to the level of a jus cogens violation of international law:

Although Orkin maintains that both the original acquisition of the drawing by Reinhart and defendants’ retention of the same constitute violations of the law of nations, he cites no authority to support this claim. Indeed, our precedent is to the contrary. See IIT v. Vencap, Ltd., 519 F.2d 1001, 1015 (2d Cir. 1975) (Friendly, J.) (“We cannot subscribe to plaintiffs’ view that the Eighth Commandment `Thou shalt not steal’ is part of the law of nations.”)

(read the full order here)

Advertisements

About Charles Donefer

I am an attorney in New York City.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s